Is First Past the Post Undemocratic?

The First Past the Post (FPTP) electoral system, used to elect British MPs and English local government representatives, is commonly criticised for being ‘undemocratic’. We challenge this idea by examining how FPTP holds up against other features of democracy, such as voter clarity and government accountability. It finds these features are more easily found in FPTP than in proportional representation (PR) systems, suggesting criticism of the system is unwarranted.
Who should read this brief?
.jpg)
All electoral systems involve trade-offs. First Past the Post cannot deliver proportionality, but it performs better than most other electoral systems on clarity in choice of government, a single member constituency link, equality of MPs, and democratic accountability.— Dr Richard Johnson
About the researcher
Dr Richard Johnson is Senior Lecturer in Politics at QMUL. He is editor (with Yuan Yi Zhu) of Sceptical Perspectives on the Changing Constitution of the United Kingdom (Hart, 2023) and Strengthening the Political Constitution (Policy Exchange, 2025). He is author (with Mark Garnett, Gavin Hyman) of Keeping the Red Flag Flying: The Labour Party in Opposition since 1922 (Polity, 2024).
Be the next author
Are you an academic at Queen Mary and want to share your research insights in a brief? Email Evie Edwards, Impact Engagement Officer, evie.edwards@qmul.ac.uk