Skip to main content
The William Harvey Research Institute - Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry

Pacemaker therapy for HCM

Read the paper: Distal Ventricular Pacing for Drug-Refractory Mid-Cavity Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Personalized Pacing

Full Title: A randomised clinical study to test the efficacy of distal ventricular pacing for pressure gradient reduction across the site of mid-cavity obstruction in patients with inherited cardiomyopathy

Short Title: Pacemaker in HCM

Sponsor: Barts Health NHS Trust

Funder: NIHR Fellowship Award

Chief Investigator: Dr Sam Mohiddin

Co-Investigators: Dr James Malcolmson, Barts Heart Centre

Contact: saidi.mohiddin@nhs.net

Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03450252

Study Design: Randomised, controlled crossover trial

Objectives:

  • To assess the efficacy of distal ventricular pacing in reducing the pressure gradient at the site of mid-cavity obstruction in patients with inherited cardiomyopathy
  • To compare patient-reported outcomes during periods of active pacing and back-up pacing

Number of Participants: 25

Devices Used: Cardiac pacemaker

Study Duration: 12 months

Location: Barts Heart Centre, London

Summary: Inherited cardiomyopathy can cause obstruction and abnormally high pressures within the heart, leading to symptoms that are often not well managed by medication alone. A novel pacing technique has been developed using a cardiac pacemaker to target this mid-cavity obstruction, aiming to relieve these pressures and associated symptoms.

The Pacemaker in HCM study was designed to test whether this new technique could offer clinical benefit. Patients in the study received both an active treatment period (with distal ventricular pacing) and a non-treatment period (with back-up pacing) in a randomised, crossover manner. This allowed for direct comparison of symptom improvement within the same individual.

Previous use of the pacing method showed varying outcomes across patients, highlighting the need for this formal evaluation. After both six-month periods, participants reported which phase they felt better in, and only then was it revealed which was the active treatment phase. The results will help determine whether targeted pacemaker therapy should be adopted more widely for treating symptoms in patients with obstructive cardiomyopathy.

Back to top